What is a Simpson’s Rule Calculator?
A Simpson’s Rule Calculator is a numerical integration tool that approximates the definite integral of a function over an interval
by fitting parabolas through sampled points. It implements the classic Simpson’s \(1/3\) rule and its composite form to estimate
\(\int_a^b f(x)\,dx\) with high accuracy using evenly spaced nodes. Because Simpson’s method is fourth-order accurate for smooth
functions, it is typically far more precise than the midpoint or trapezoidal rules for the same number of function evaluations.
The calculator accepts an integrand, interval endpoints, and an even number of subintervals, then returns the approximation, a
breakdown of weights, and (optionally) an error estimate when bounds on \(f^{(4)}\) are known. All equations render responsively
with MathJax or math.js.
About the Simpson’s Rule Calculator
Simpson’s single-panel rule uses three points \(a\), \(m=\tfrac{a+b}{2}\), and \(b\) to fit a quadratic and integrate it exactly:
\[
\int_a^b f(x)\,dx \;\approx\; \frac{b-a}{6}\,\big[f(a) + 4f\!\left(\tfrac{a+b}{2}\right) + f(b)\big].
\]
The composite rule partitions \([a,b]\) into \(n\) even subintervals of width \(h=\tfrac{b-a}{n}\), nodes \(x_i=a+ih\),
and applies alternating weights:
\[
S_n \;=\; \frac{h}{3}\Big[f(x_0)+4\!\!\sum_{\substack{i=1\\ i\ \text{odd}}}^{n-1}\!f(x_i)+2\!\!\sum_{\substack{i=2\\ i\ \text{even}}}^{n-2}\!f(x_i)+f(x_n)\Big].
\]
For sufficiently smooth \(f\), the error satisfies
\[
\big|E_S\big| \;\le\; \frac{(b-a)}{180}\,h^4\,\max_{\xi\in[a,b]}\big|f^{(4)}(\xi)\big|.
\]
The calculator also supports adaptive Simpson’s logic conceptually, halving subintervals where curvature is high until a target
tolerance is met, thereby balancing accuracy and performance.
How to Use this Simpson’s Rule Calculator
- Enter the integrand \(f(x)\) and the interval endpoints \(a\) and \(b\) (with \(a<b\)).
- Select the number of subintervals \(n\) (must be even) or choose a target error tolerance for adaptive strategy.
- Compute \(h=\tfrac{b-a}{n}\), sample \(f(x_i)\) at nodes \(x_i=a+ih\), and apply Simpson’s composite weights.
- Review the result \(S_n\), optional error bound, and (if enabled) per-panel contributions for diagnostics.
- Increase \(n\) or tighten tolerance if the estimated error is above your requirement.
Core Formulas (LaTeX for MathJax/math.js)
Single-panel (1/3) rule: \[
\int_a^b f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{b-a}{6}\big[f(a)+4f\!\left(\tfrac{a+b}{2}\right)+f(b)\big].
\]
Composite rule (even \(n\)): \[
S_n=\frac{h}{3}\Big[f(x_0)+4\!\!\sum_{i\ \text{odd}} f(x_i)+2\!\!\sum_{i\ \text{even},\ 0
Error bound (smooth \(f\)): \[
|E_S|\le \frac{(b-a)}{180}h^4\max_{[a,b]}|f^{(4)}(x)|.
\]
Examples (Illustrative)
Example 1 — Polynomial (exact)
\(f(x)=x^2\) on \([0,2]\), \(n=2\), \(h=1\). Values: \(f(0)=0\), \(f(1)=1\), \(f(2)=4\).
\(S_2=\tfrac{1}{3}[0+4(1)+4]=\tfrac{8}{3}=2.\overline{6}\), which equals the exact integral \(\int_0^2 x^2 dx=\tfrac{8}{3}\).
Example 2 — Trigonometric
\(f(x)=\sin x\) on \([0,\pi]\), \(n=8\), \(h=\pi/8\). Apply composite weights to get \(S_8\approx 2.0001\) (exact integral is \(2\)).
Example 3 — Adaptive idea
\(f(x)=e^{-x^2}\) on \([0,1]\). Adaptive Simpson refines where curvature is largest, achieving \(\approx 0.746824\) within a tight tolerance.
FAQs
What is Simpson’s Rule?
A fourth-order numerical integration technique that fits parabolas through evenly spaced points to approximate definite integrals.
Why must the number of subintervals be even?
Each Simpson panel spans two subintervals; composite Simpson stitches panels, requiring an even \(n\).
How do I choose the step size \(h\)?
Start with modest \(n\), then increase \(n\) (reduce \(h\)) until the estimate stabilizes or meets the error tolerance.
Is Simpson’s Rule exact for polynomials?
Yes—up to cubic polynomials. Degree ≤ 3 are integrated exactly (to machine precision).
What if my integrand isn’t smooth?
Discontinuities or kinks degrade accuracy. Split the interval at problematic points or consider specialized methods.
How is the error estimated?
Using \(|E_S|\le \frac{(b-a)}{180}h^4\max|f^{(4)}|\) or by comparing results at \(n\) and \(2n\) (Richardson-style).
When is Simpson better than the trapezoidal rule?
For smooth functions, Simpson often achieves similar accuracy with far fewer samples than trapezoidal.
Can I use nonuniform spacing?
Classical Simpson assumes equal spacing. For nonuniform meshes, use adaptive quadrature or Gaussian rules.
Does the calculator handle improper integrals?
You can truncate to a large finite interval or transform variables; ensure convergence before trusting results.